Please get in touch at your convenience and discuss the complexity rather than the KISS principle.
Like to get the glocal and intergenerationally responsible position?
I am more than happy to engage to find the pathway to 'cut through the chase'.
Just look at the "Tamar Action Group" Facebook and website in Tasmania for example, the call to touch a raw nerve of denial ... It is a complex issue that deserves to be resolved for the common good for change.
I agree - the right solutions are complex, and I'm going to dig into them in future pieces. But, as a relative novice in the field, it was really hard to understand why people thought about biochar in the way they do. Hence the focus on the cultural/philosophical basis for the movement.
In any case, I'll reach out - look forward to chatting. Finding a way through to a scaling and climate positive industry remains my goal.
It would be a good move to also get the picture of the non traditionally English language dominated Countries. Also it is crucial to apply the real life science systems approach, rather than the conventional narrow focused bullet approach.
Bates & Draper pointed this out very well.
Kelpie Wilson in her article "How Biochar Works in Soil" in 'the Biochar Journal' by the Ithaka Institute provides a credible explanation.
Regenerative, Restorative and Renovative Management Practices to increase the cooling / available moisture effect in forested landscape and urban situations can bring about 10°C or more cooling - Evapotranspiration.
ProSilva style forest management with very site specific and time sensitive decision making, planning and actions (non clearfell forestry) practices as demonstrated in Slovenia since 1948 with complex systems thinking is not fringe or greenie dreaming but working with light, space and diversity ...
Please get in touch at your convenience and discuss the complexity rather than the KISS principle.
Like to get the glocal and intergenerationally responsible position?
I am more than happy to engage to find the pathway to 'cut through the chase'.
Just look at the "Tamar Action Group" Facebook and website in Tasmania for example, the call to touch a raw nerve of denial ... It is a complex issue that deserves to be resolved for the common good for change.
You got my contact details.
Frank
Skype: Frank Strie terrapreta...
I agree - the right solutions are complex, and I'm going to dig into them in future pieces. But, as a relative novice in the field, it was really hard to understand why people thought about biochar in the way they do. Hence the focus on the cultural/philosophical basis for the movement.
In any case, I'll reach out - look forward to chatting. Finding a way through to a scaling and climate positive industry remains my goal.
It would be a good move to also get the picture of the non traditionally English language dominated Countries. Also it is crucial to apply the real life science systems approach, rather than the conventional narrow focused bullet approach.
Bates & Draper pointed this out very well.
Kelpie Wilson in her article "How Biochar Works in Soil" in 'the Biochar Journal' by the Ithaka Institute provides a credible explanation.
Regenerative, Restorative and Renovative Management Practices to increase the cooling / available moisture effect in forested landscape and urban situations can bring about 10°C or more cooling - Evapotranspiration.
ProSilva style forest management with very site specific and time sensitive decision making, planning and actions (non clearfell forestry) practices as demonstrated in Slovenia since 1948 with complex systems thinking is not fringe or greenie dreaming but working with light, space and diversity ...
Best regards
Frank
http://fingerlakesbiochar.com/blog - Let's be fair and authentic!